← Weekly archive
GLOBAL DEVELOPMENTS WORTH WATCHING · ISSUE 112

Weekly briefing 112

Published
Middle EastEuropeIndo-PacificAfricaSecurityEnergyAITradeCritical mineralsEconomics

The complete briefing is available below.

The Week in Brief

In a world where historical alliances are eroding, the "sanction inflation" and the rejection of humanitarian dependency highlighted in Issue 111 are now translating into assertive acts of self-defense and calculated risk management. At the center of it all is the Trump-Xi summit in Beijing—a meeting that delivered symbolic gestures alongside strict red lines regarding Taiwan, with the ultimate outcome still uncertain.

While the superpowers attempt to temporarily stabilize the status quo, the reality on the ground dictates its own relentless pace. Putin, arriving in China immediately following the U.S.-Sino summit, launched an unprecedented aerial assault on Ukraine. Meanwhile, the eastern European spillover of the war has already brought down the Latvian government, and historical nationalist tensions are resurfacing between Czechia and Germany. These summits are designed to manage a fragile stability, but they offer no immediate solutions to the crises on the ground; as a result, regional players continue to fortify themselves for prolonged friction.

As part of our effort to adapt to the new era, here is our dedicated chatbot (Gemini Gem), trained on our latest updates. It’s ready to answer any questions you have.

Geopolitical Dynamics

A. The Balance of Deterrence at the Beijing Summit: The Trump-Xi meeting concluded with symbolic gestures alongside provocations, signaling a mutual desire to maintain a fragile detente while exposing deep structural fractures. While the White House attempted to focus the talks on expanding market access and ending the fighting in Iran, the Chinese President drew a firm red line, warning that any mishandling of the Taiwan issue would lead to a "dangerous collision." Ultimately, the summit functioned as an exercise in risk management; expecting a near-term resolution to the core economic or technological disputes between the superpowers remains unrealistic.

B. The Energy Blockade and the Ultimatum to Cuba: Cuba suffered a complete shutdown of its power grid after running out of diesel and fuel—a direct result of Washington's efforts to sanction any country supplying fuel to the island. The sudden arrival of the CIA Director in Havana just hours later clarified the conditions: the U.S. is offering a $100 million financial lifeline, but in exchange for a complete economic opening and for Cuba to sever its ties with China and Russia.

C. The Tokyo-Seoul Axis vs. The Hormuz Shockwaves: Despite historical grievances, the leaders of Japan and South Korea tightened their strategic alliance with a series of agreements covering natural gas, oil, and critical minerals. The severe economic pressure generated by the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz—which has pushed inflation to 4.9% in Japan and 2.6% in South Korea—is overriding historical baggage and forcing both nations to build an independent energy safety net.

D. The Sudetenland Crisis: Far-right members of the Czech government launched an unusually fierce diplomatic attack against Germany. This followed a senior Bavarian official's intention to attend the first historic congress of "Sudeten Germans" on Czech soil—an event that brings the 1938 annexation and the subsequent ethnic expulsions back to the forefront. Combined with Prague's clashes with Germany's AfD party and the resurfacing of the Hungarian expulsion issue in Slovak-Hungarian talks, this points to a concerning trend: as economic and security pressures mount across Europe, nationalism is challenging the EU's overall cohesion.

Security and Threats

A. Russian Assault in the Shadow of the China Summit: Exactly as a three-day ceasefire ended, Russia launched one of its largest aerial assaults since the war began, firing over 1,500 drones and dozens of missiles at Ukraine. The timing of this assault, coinciding with Trump’s visit to China, suggests Putin is signaling to Washington the limits of its ability to force an end to the war, while also preparing the ground for his own visit to Beijing. During that visit, the two sides discussed deepening their relationship, with China continuing to dictate the pace of their ties.

B. Trump Freezes Taiwan Arms Deal: Immediately following his meeting with Xi, Trump announced he is delaying a decision on a $14 billion arms deal with Taiwan, openly stating he is using the weapons sales as a "bargaining chip" with Beijing. This move signals a departure from the traditional doctrine of "strategic ambiguity" in favor of business pragmatism, raising concerns among U.S. allies in Asia regarding American security guarantees.

C. The Pentagon’s Minerals War Room: A new sub-department has been established to accelerate government funding and deals for the independent production of rare earth metals. The move reflects Washington's realization that China's near-total monopoly on the mineral supply chains critical for defense and electronics constitutes a significant security vulnerability, necessitating a shift toward a more nationalized, subsidized market approach in this sector.

Economy and Trade

A. Confirming the Fed Chair and Monetary Independence: The U.S. Senate confirmed the new Federal Reserve Chairman by the narrowest, most partisan margin in history (54-45). This deep divide reflects the market's anxiety about the potential erosion of the central bank's independence in favor of the White House's agenda, especially as Kevin Warsh is already signaling his intent to lead an aggressive reduction in the Fed’s balance sheet.

B. Fuel Prices Accelerate the EV Market: Electric Vehicle (EV) sales in Europe surged 27% last month, while doubling in emerging markets outside of China and Europe. These numbers indicate that the global energy crisis and spiking fuel prices are acting as a forced accelerator for the transition to alternative energy, independent of green regulation. This trend stands out against the UK's recent decision to slash its contribution to the global climate fund by half due to budget cuts.

Crises and Upheavals

A. Political Unrest in Bolivia: A massive strike and violent protests led by labor unions paralyzed the capital, causing roadblocks and severely impacting economic activity. The crisis, erupting just six months after the conservative president's election, is fueled by fears of spiking fuel prices. It signals the resurgence of the left and serves as further evidence that macroeconomic shocks can rapidly translate into a loss of domestic governance.

B. The Ebola Crisis in Congo Tests Global Health: The WHO has declared an international public health emergency following the outbreak of a lethal strain of the Ebola virus in Congo and Uganda, which has already claimed over 100 lives. The crisis threatens to expand, exacerbated by the U.S. administration's decision to withdraw from the WHO and reduce aid budgets.

C. Latvia's Government Collapses from Ukraine Spillover: Latvia's Prime Minister resigned, triggering the collapse of the country's center-left coalition. The breaking point occurred when her senior coalition partner, the "Progressives" party, withdrew its support following the government's evident failure to handle Ukrainian drones penetrating the country's airspace (one of which crashed into a fuel storage facility). The physical spillover of the war has directly caused a domestic political crisis, heightening anxieties in Riga, Vilnius, and Tallinn over NATO's capacity to effectively defend the continent's skies.

“Surely goodness and mercy shall follow” (Psalm 23).

The Geopolitics Lab Team

Follow the thread

Ask the archive →
ISSUE 133

Escalating conflicts, diverging allies

ISSUE 132

From commitments to implementation

ISSUE 131

Redistributing geopolitical risk